<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title> &#187; Microgrid News</title>
	<atom:link href="/category/microgridnews/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://greenenergycorp.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2017 18:37:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.27</generator>
	<item>
		<title>City of Eugene Does What the UN Can&#8217;t and Makes GHG Reductions Legally Binding</title>
		<link>http://greenenergycorp.com/2014/06/06/city-of-eugene-does-what-the-un-cant-and-makes-ghg-reductions-legally-binding/</link>
		<comments>http://greenenergycorp.com/2014/06/06/city-of-eugene-does-what-the-un-cant-and-makes-ghg-reductions-legally-binding/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2014 08:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[msinclair@greenenergycorp.com]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microgrid News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenenergycorp.com/?p=1099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Amy Huva May 29, 2014 This week, the City of Eugene did what no one else has been able to do since the Kyoto Protocol expired: they voted to take the first step in making their greenhouse gas (GHG) &#8230; <a href="/2014/06/06/city-of-eugene-does-what-the-un-cant-and-makes-ghg-reductions-legally-binding/">Continued</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="color: #2d2d2d;"><span style="color: #000000;">By <span style="color: #000000;">Amy Huva</span></span></p>
<p style="color: #2d2d2d;">May 29, 2014</p>
<p style="color: #2d2d2d;"><span style="color: #000000;"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1100" src="/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/city-of-eugene-article.jpg" alt="city of eugene article" width="465" height="309" />This week, the City of Eugene did what no one else has been able to do since the Kyoto Protocol expired: they voted to take the first step in making their greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction targets legally binding. Yes, you read that correctly - the city council voted 7 - 1 in favor of drafting an ordinance setting community GHG reductions and codifying their goal of 50% reduction in fossil fuel use by 2030.</span></p>
<p style="color: #2d2d2d;"><span style="color: #000000;">Eugene is the first city in the United States to have taken this step and joins a small group of countries and regions that also have legally binding targets. Climate Access&#8217; Amy Huva spoke with Matt McRae about action on climate in Eugene.</span></p>
<p style="color: #2d2d2d;"><span style="color: #000000;">Matt McRae knows that for most people, climate change is not a front-of-mind issue. Speak to most people on the streets of Eugene, Oregon where he&#8217;s the city&#8217;s Climate and Energy Analyst and they wouldn&#8217;t be able to tell you about the Climate Action Plan that&#8217;s being implemented or reporting on greenhouse gas reduction targets.</span></p>
<p style="color: #2d2d2d;"><span style="color: #000000;">But whether people here know it or not, Eugene is tackling climate disruption head-on. Eugene has the highest per-capital density of hybrid cars in the US and household-level activities like recycling, composting and biking to work are increasingly popular. McRae says residents are hugely supportive of local and <span style="color: #000000;">community gardens</span> because people feel like they don&#8217;t have influence on their food systems and want nourishment grown closer to home.</span></p>
<p style="color: #2d2d2d;"><span style="color: #000000;">Eugene is also recognizing that systemic or institutional shifts play a key role in climate progress. The city has an impressive <span style="color: #000000;">target</span> of reducing fossil fuel use by 50 percent by 2030. The city of Eugene has entered the &#8216;getting off our fossil fuel addiction&#8217; program.</span></p>
<p style="color: #2d2d2d;"><span style="color: #000000;">The city&#8217;s completed to-do list is already impressive: Eugene Water and Electric Board&#8217;s <span style="color: #000000;">local energy retrofit program </span>has been linked to low and no-interest loans for households to undertake energy saving retrofits; the city also undertook <span style="color: #000000;">20-minute Neighborhood Assessments</span> where each area was rated for walkability and bikeability and local residents were engaged on how their neighborhoods could be improved with better access to services. Eugene is also thinking about more integrated approaches to building resiliency to climate change â€“ for the Hazard Mitigation Plan update, for example, officials are asking experts from sectors like transportation, electricity, water and housing what their weak points would be in a natural disaster.</span></p>
<p style="color: #2d2d2d;"><span style="color: #000000;">Together, these activities are making a difference. Since 2006, (the year they had best data for) fossil fuel use has decreased by 2.5 per cent each year. Electricity use is down 15 per cent from 2000 levels and natural gas consumption is down 12 per cent since 2006. All of this adds up to Eugene being on track to meet its 2030 target.</span></p>
<p style="color: #2d2d2d;"><span style="color: #000000;">There&#8217;s only one kicker - no one is sure precisely what caused the turning point in fossil fuel use. It could be one policy, two policies together or the sum of all the parts. This is a question McRae wants to answer. With the help of occasional interns at the Oregon Department of Energy and Transportation, he&#8217;s going through a list of &#8216;suspects&#8217; to try and identify exactly how and why change is happening (which sounds to me like a PhD topic waiting to happen).</span></p>
<p style="color: #2d2d2d;"><span style="color: #000000;">Regardless of how Eugene is doing it, McRae firmly believes changing our systems will have the biggest impact. He&#8217;s trying to make sure that people who are taking steps in their daily lives to deal with climate change connect the dots between local and state policies and energy choices and costs, in the hopes of raising a voice for long-term thinking when decisions are being made. His goal is to make sure climate change is a consideration in all things the city does.</span></p>
<p style="color: #2d2d2d;"><span style="color: #000000;">For instance, the Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan needs to be updated every five years in order to get access to FEMA funding, so he wants to make sure the update covers heatwaves as well as the usual flood, fire and earthquake risks.</span><br />
<span style="color: #000000;">It&#8217;s no small task.</span></p>
<p style="color: #2d2d2d;"><span style="color: #000000;">But once McRae&#8217;s figured out the solution, he&#8217;ll be sure to let us know so we can all get started on it.</span></p>
<p style="color: #2d2d2d;"><em><span style="color: #a9a9a9;">image: Sean McGrath vis cc flickr</span></em></p>
<p style="color: #2d2d2d;"><em>This story was taken from ClimateAccess.org. For more information <a href="http://www.climateaccess.org/blog/city-eugene-does-what-un-canâ€™t-and-makes-ghg-reductions-legally-binding?utm_source=Climate+Access+Newsletter&amp;utm_campaign=d71e78bd8f-Update_5_30_145_29_2014&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_term=0_967f14f722-d71e78bd8f-318057253" target="_blank">click here.</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://greenenergycorp.com/2014/06/06/city-of-eugene-does-what-the-un-cant-and-makes-ghg-reductions-legally-binding/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Green energy investment set to &#8220;explode&#8221; after Obama unveils carbon cuts</title>
		<link>http://greenenergycorp.com/2014/06/04/obama-carbon-cuts/</link>
		<comments>http://greenenergycorp.com/2014/06/04/obama-carbon-cuts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2014 03:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[msinclair@greenenergycorp.com]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microgrid News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenenergycorp.com/?p=1031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Renee Lewis May 31, 2014 3:52PM ET Administration seeks to cut carbon emissions from power plants by up to 30 percent by 2030 Federal plans for new carbon emission cuts — reportedly by up to 30 percent from 2005 levels — could &#8230; <a href="/2014/06/04/obama-carbon-cuts/">Continued</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Renee Lewis<br />
May 31, 2014 3:52PM ET</p>
<h5><em>Administration seeks to cut carbon emissions from power plants by up to 30 percent by 2030</em></h5>
<p>Federal plans for new carbon emission cuts — reportedly by up to 30<b> </b>percent from 2005 levels — could spark a rapid expansion in the renewables sector, environmental groups predicted Sunday ahead of the unveiling of a new government blueprint on clean energy.</p>
<div class="text section" style="color: #3f4245;">
<p style="color: #000000;">&#8220;If you&#8217;re working in the solar or wind industry, you should feel very happy right now. Those are the industries growing faster than the rest of economy,&#8221; Mike Brune, executive director of the Sierra Club, said. &#8220;It&#8217;s clear that those are going to be the industries to work in, invest in and watch. They&#8217;re about to explode in terms of growth.&#8221;</p>
<p style="color: #000000;">The comments came on the eve of an announcement Monday in which Environmental Protection Agency chief Gina McCarthy is expected to outline new limits on existing power plants. In anticipation of the new guidelines, President Barack Obama said Saturday that it was time for &#8220;higher standards to cut pollution&#8221; and that the new rules would &#8220;cut down on the carbon pollution, smog and soot that threatens the health of the most vulnerable Americans, including children and the elderly.&#8221;</p>
<p style="color: #000000;">The new rules could bolster an industry that has already benefited from a flow of new cash and new demand.</p>
</div>
<div class="parbase textimage section" style="color: #3f4245;">
<div class="image_right">
<div class="textImage-box clearfix">
<div class="text">
<p style="color: #000000;">Warren Buffett, the billionaire owner of Iowa utility MidAmerican, announced a $1.9 billion investment in wind farms earlier this month. MidAmerican plans to generate almost half its electricity from wind by 2017.</p>
<p style="color: #000000;">In January a Minnesota judge, tasked by the state&#8217;s public utilities commission to look into the pricing of electricity for consumers, held that the utility Xcel Energy should invest in the solar energy developer Geronimo Energy rather than in natural gas generators because that choice would be the better economical and environmental deal for the state.</p>
<p style="color: #000000;">Every four minutes, an American home or business goes solar, Obama said earlier this month in a speech on the U.S. transition to clean energy. Solar panels were installed on the White House the same day.</p>
<p style="color: #000000;">The standards that Obama is set to unveil on Monday, including details of the new carbon pollution standards for power plants as part of a new set of EPA guidelines to address climate change, will push renewables&#8217; progress even further — replacing dirty fuels, experts believe.</p>
<p style="color: #000000;">About a third of coal plants online in 2009 have been retired or will be soon, Brune said.</p>
<p style="color: #000000;">Obama&#8217;s announcement of new emission cuts follows the release of a series of scientific reports filled with dire warnings from hundreds of climate scientists saying carbon emissions must be cut now in order to avoid some of the worst effects of global warming.</p>
<p style="color: #000000;">Power plants are responsible for almost half of America&#8217;s carbon pollution and collectively are the single largest source of such emissions in the country. Currently there are no limits on the amount of carbon those plants may emit. &#8220;It&#8217;s not smart, it&#8217;s not safe, and it doesn&#8217;t make sense,&#8221; said Obama.</p>
<p>Though details of the cuts will not be unveiled until Monday, The Wall Street Journal reported Sunday that the executive order could include forcing carbon emission cuts of 30 percent on existing power plants by 2030, based their 2005 emission levels.</p>
<p>Citing two people briefed on the proposed rule, the newspaper said individual states will have to implement the cuts, with compliance plans due to be submitted to the EPA by June 2016.</p>
<p>Though the extent of the emission cuts hasn&#8217;t been confirmed yet, environmentalists had hoped to see a larger percentage when Obama releases the figures Monday.</p>
<p>â€œWhat we&#8217;re looking for are cuts of 35 to 40 percent by 2020 from 2012 levels,â€ Brune said. &#8220;This is what we need to see in order to get the carbon reduction from the U.S. that will both compel international negotiations and meet what climate scientists are saying has to be done.&#8221;</p>
<p>Cuts based on the 2012 emission levels would be much more significant than using 2005 levels as the baseline, he added.</p>
<p>Climate scientists have warned that the world&#8217;s temperature increase has to be capped at 1.5 degrees Celsius. According to Brune, that would require carbon emission cuts of about 50 from 2012 levels percent by 2030.</p>
<p>The EPA guidelines will also include plans to prepare the U.S. for the effects of climate change — including strengthening roads, bridges and shorelines — after scientists warned of an increase in extreme weather events like 2012&#8242;s Hurricane Sandy. The government will also strive to lead international efforts to combat climate change through global negotiations.</p>
<p>&#8220;Last year alone, there were 11 different weather and climate disaster events with estimated losses exceeding $1 billion in estimated damages, which would make it the second-costliest year on record,â€ according to the president&#8217;s climate action plan released last June.</p>
<p>Reports of the new EPA guidelines have prompted a Republican backlash in anticipation of the plan.</p>
<p>Wyoming Republican Sen. Mike Enzi said Saturday that the plan would make electricity more expensive, &#8220;if we can get it.&#8221; He added that the rules would make little or no difference in combating pollution and climate change but would hit the pockets of average Americans.</p>
<p>&#8220;Let&#8217;s face it, that&#8217;s what they always say,&#8221; Obama said in his weekly address Saturday from Washington. &#8220;They warned that doing something about the smog choking our cities and acid rain poisoning our lakes would kill business. It didn&#8217;t. Our air got cleaner, acid rain was cut dramatically, and our economy kept growing.&#8221;</p>
<p>He added that nearly a dozen states have already implemented their own market-based programs to reduce carbon pollution. Over 1,000 mayors have signed agreements to cut their cities&#8217; emissions.</p>
<p>&#8220;The idea of setting higher standards to cut pollution at our power plants is not new,&#8221; the president said. &#8220;œIts just time for Washington to catch up with the rest of the country.&#8221;</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p><em>This story is reprinted from america.aljazeera.com. To see the full report,</em> <a href="http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2014/6/1/obama-carbon-epa.html" target="_blank">click here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://greenenergycorp.com/2014/06/04/obama-carbon-cuts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report Examines Microgrids in Asia Pacific</title>
		<link>http://greenenergycorp.com/2014/04/30/report-examines-microgrids-in-asia-pacific/</link>
		<comments>http://greenenergycorp.com/2014/04/30/report-examines-microgrids-in-asia-pacific/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2014 22:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[msinclair@greenenergycorp.com]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microgrid News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenenergycorp.com/?p=685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Asia Pacific consists of many divergent aspects, including diverse demographic factors, different economic and social infrastructure levels, and different levels of power grid development. As a result, the requirements for microgrids differ greatly among Asia Pacific nations. Demand for microgrids &#8230; <a href="/2014/04/30/report-examines-microgrids-in-asia-pacific/">Continued</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Asia Pacific consists of many divergent aspects, including diverse demographic factors, different economic and social infrastructure levels, and different levels of power grid development.</strong> As a result, the requirements for microgrids differ greatly among Asia Pacific nations. Demand for microgrids also varies on a market-by-market basis in Asia Pacific, and each nation is at a different level of resource development. As renewable energy capacity and electricity consumption continue to rise, the number of microgrid projects deployed in Asia Pacific, both for electrification purposes and as experimental test beds, is also rising. Developed nations within the Asia Pacific region are currently waiting for operational data from pilot projects and commercial installations that should reveal trends in financing models, business models, and technology preferences. However, it might take a few years to gather and analyze data from the projects.</p>
<p><br style="color: #000000;" /><span style="color: #000000;">The proper management of existing power grids and the maintenance of more efficient balance between load and generation on the grid are challenging issues for developed nations with mature economies active in the microgrid space. Developed nations located within the Asia Pacific region are actively pursuing community-based and commercial/industrial microgrid developments. Some demonstration projects focused on integrating renewable resources are being tested and developed with the goal to deliver multiple applications to the end user. Specifically, Japan and South Korea aim to export microgrid business models and systems and then capture a larger share of global supply chain opportunities in global markets. </span><br style="color: #000000;" /><br style="color: #000000;" /><span style="color: #000000;">By contrast, developing nations in the region face more urgent issues related to power supply. Low electrification, an underdeveloped power grid infrastructure, and a lack of capital to underwrite new technologies to advance power grid services are key challenges that developing Asia Pacific nations face. In a region where simply providing sufficient electricity is challenging, governments and utilities are struggling to establish efficient ways to supply power to rural villages and remote islands. </span><br style="color: #000000;" /><br style="color: #000000;" /><span style="color: #000000;">Microgrids are critical to advancing greater reliance on various forms of distributed generation , advanced energy storage, and demand response . Yet, the introduction of microgrids is not a simple issue. Microgrids require the coordinated operation of the power storage system and renewable distributed energy generation and maintenance of power grid supply and demand imbalances, as well as robust RDEG controls and enabling technologies. </span><br style="color: #000000;" /><br style="color: #000000;" /><span style="color: #000000;">From a macro view, however, all of the parties making policy in the Asia Pacific region agree that microgrids should be the ultimate goal for providing electricity and achieving greater energy efficiency. The individual governments and market stakeholders in Asia Pacific aim to solve their current shortage of reliable energy by launching various initiatives, policies, support programs, and test trials. The focus areas of these microgrid initiatives are related to increasing power capacity at the test sites and then allowing industry (including utilities) to take the next steps forward.  </span><a title="Read More" href="http://microgrid-news.com/mn4-22-14-1-microgrids-asia-pacific-report-navigant.htm" target="_blank">Read More</a></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"><i>This was reprinted from Microgrid News. For more information on the report, <a style="color: #6699ff;" href="http://microgrid-news.com/mn4-22-14-1-microgrids-asia-pacific-report-navigant.htm" target="_blank">click here</a></i></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://greenenergycorp.com/2014/04/30/report-examines-microgrids-in-asia-pacific/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Navigant Research Releases Latest Microgrid Deployment Tracker</title>
		<link>http://greenenergycorp.com/2014/04/13/navigant-research-releases-latest-microgrid-deployment-tracker/</link>
		<comments>http://greenenergycorp.com/2014/04/13/navigant-research-releases-latest-microgrid-deployment-tracker/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2014 04:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[msinclair@greenenergycorp.com]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microgrid News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenenergycorp.com/?p=745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microgrids are a global phenomenon. Yet, a clear definition of what is and what is not a microgrid is still open to debate. One of the few government agencies to define a microgrid is the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), &#8230; <a href="/2014/04/13/navigant-research-releases-latest-microgrid-deployment-tracker/">Continued</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Microgrids are a global phenomenon.</strong> Yet, a clear definition of what is and what is not a microgrid is still open to debate. One of the few government agencies to define a microgrid is the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), which identifies a microgrid as:</p>
<ul style="color: #000000;">&#8220;A group of interconnected loads and distributed energy resources (DER) within clearly defined electrical boundaries that act as a single controllable entity with respect to the grid. A microgrid can connect and disconnect from the grid to enable it to operate in both grid-connected and island-mode.&#8221;</ul>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">Navigant Research has broadened this widely accepted definition of a microgrid to include remote systems in its analysis. Remote microgrids are networks that are not typically interconnected with any utility grid or may interconnect with a highly unreliable grid; therefore, they operate in island mode for a majority of the time. It was these remote, off-grid systems that were first called microgrids decades ago. </span><br style="color: #000000;" /><br style="color: #000000;" /><span style="color: #000000;">The research firm recently published its latest Microgrid Deployment Tracker, the seventh edition of its microgrid database that is updated biannually and now covers six microgrid market segments and six principal geographies, dividing the previous Rest of World geographic segment into Latin America, the Middle East &amp; Africa, and Antarctica. It lists operating, planned/under development, and proposed microgrids, as well as selected projects that lay the foundation for viable microgrids over the next 3 to 5 years. </span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h4><b style="color: #000000;">New Findings and Insights.</b></h4>
<p>Many new microgrids are still under the radar and, consequently, have not yet made it into Navigant&#8217;s database. Some vendors claim to have large project portfolios, but due to client sensitivity and a desire to remain opaque in business development efforts, did not reveal project details for publication in this report. Many microgrid developers/integrators have nondisclosure agreements in place. Nevertheless, seeds have already been planted for the next update to this Tracker, given the long lead time required to collect sensitive project data.</p>
<p><br style="color: #000000;" /><span style="color: #000000;">Navigant primarily focused on the remote microgrid segment in this update, a reflection of recent research activity in the segment that has historically been underrepresented. Therefore, it should come as no surprise that this segment features the largest increase: the addition of 155 new projects representing 60 MW of additional capacity.</span><br style="color: #000000;" /><br style="color: #000000;" /><span style="color: #000000;">The vast majority of the new project entries (135) were in the Asia Pacific region, concentrated in India, which is the global leader in terms of numbers of deployed microgrids to date. The largest source of new capacity is the community/utility segment, with an addition of 154 MW. In the remote segment, the largest number of new project entries from a single vendor came from Optimal Power Solutions. The leading vendor in grid-tied microgrid markets was Tecogen with its modular combined heat and power (CHP) technology. </span><br style="color: #000000;" /><br style="color: #000000;" /><span style="color: #000000;">This seventh edition of the Microgrid Deployment Tracker is current as of March 2014. The result is a much more robust microgrid market than in 2009, when Navigant first began to develop the world&#8217;s only database and commercial analysis of this corner of the smart grid movement. New vendors continue to enter this space and previously undiscovered projects keep coming to the fore. As of this update, Navigant has identified a total of 4,393 MW of total microgrid capacity throughout the world, up from 4,148 MW in the previous update in 4Q 2013.</span><br style="color: #000000;" /><br style="color: #000000;" /><span style="color: #000000;">This current edition of the Tracker again reinforces the premise long held by the research firm that North America is the world&#8217;s most fertile environment for microgrids due to the declining reliability of its distribution grid. As a region, North America is still the world&#8217;s leading market for microgrids with a planned, proposed, and deployed capacity of 2,874 MW, which represents roughly 66% of the global microgrid market. North America also leads the world in terms of microgrids currently under development or in the proposal process with a capacity market share of 67%. Of the total North American microgrid capacity, 1,542 MW is currently online and more than 1,363 MW is in the planned/under development or proposed phase.</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><i style="color: #000000;">This was reprinted with permission from Migrogrid News. For more information on the report, <a style="color: #6699ff;" href="http://microgrid-news.com/mn4-3-14-1-Navigant-Research-Releases-Latest-Microgrid-Deployment-Tracker.htm" target="_blank">click here</a></i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://greenenergycorp.com/2014/04/13/navigant-research-releases-latest-microgrid-deployment-tracker/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
